Tag Archives: Hollingbury Park

Brighton’s parks at risk

Have a look at this: – https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-parks

Britain’s parks are at risk. There’s no legal responsibility to look after them and squeezed budgets mean our local green spaces – from playgrounds, to the park you relax in on your lunch break – don’t have the money they need. We could end up being forced to pay to use our parks – or lose them altogether. 

A group of MPs are looking into the crisis right now. They’re thinking of making protecting parks a legal requirement, and they’ll advise the government on what to do. A huge petition, signed by all of us, will prove how much we love our parks. It could convince the MPs to come up with a water-tight plan for protecting them. 

Can you sign the petition now and demand that looking after our parks is made a legal requirement by the government? It only takes 30 seconds to add your name: – https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/save-our-parks.

City Plan – it’s almost there?

Brighton & Hove Friends of the Earth

We have responded to the consultation on the proposed modifications to the City Plan, which ended at midnight on 16 December. While we support much of what is proposed we have issues with three main areas:

Air pollution:  despite agreeing with the Council to proposed modifications on this issue earlier in the year, recent events (European Court Ruling and emerging research) mean that the proposed wording may be unsound as it does not go far enough to reduce air pollution and act to bring it down below legal limits as fast as possible.  In fact developments could still be approved that will make it worse.

Urban Fringe development:  we have pointed out errors in the Urban Fringe Assessment which undermine the figures for housing in the urban fringe.  We have therefore questioned whether it is justified to have an allocation of 1,060 homes in the urban fringe.

Watering down of energy efficiency:  we have objected…

View original post 138 more words

City Plan Consultation launches

Brighton & Hove City Council has launched a Consultation on suggested modifications to the original City Plan to run from Tuesday 4th November until the 16th December.

Be warned, the  Schedule of Proposed Modifications is 91 pages and diagrams of planning jargon and you will need serious commitment to wade through it and make comments and suggestions in the consultation.

City Plan Agreed

From The Argus

Councillors have agreed to launch a public consultation on the future development of Brighton and Hove in a bid to stop the city becoming a developers’ “Wild West”.

Brighton and Hove City Council’s policy and resources committee voted through the City Plan to the next stage at a meeting tonight.

A six week public consultation on the document which will lay down the ground rules for development in the city until 2030 will begin on November 4.

Councillors warned that if the City Plan was not agreed decisions on development in the city would be taken out of the hands of local decision makers and create a “planning by appeal” process that developers would win.

But dissenting voices said the plan had put urban fringe places at risk by indicating sites that could be developed.

The proposals for more than 13,000 homes had first come to the committee in July but were put on hold following pressure from environmental groups.

The council’s head of planning Martin Randall told the committee that the three month delay had allowed time for “reflection and adjustment within the tight regulations” set by the Government’s planning inspectorate.

Without agreeing it, Mr Randall said the council would be in a weak position to resist inappropriate development and be at risk at losing more decisions by appeal.

The committee was told that the City Plan would protect 90% of the city’s urban fringe.

The City Plan if agreed would ensure that urban fringe sites would only be allocated for housing with further consultation and should be used to meet local housing needs through community land trusts and low-cost self-build housing.

Green Councillor Geoffrey Bowden said: “If we don’t have a City Plan in place, there will be opening to a Wild West, a developers’ paradise.

“We might as well pack up the planning department and go straight to Whitehall so there are huge dangers if we don’t agree to this.”

Labour Councillor Warren Morgan said the council had to protect the city’s allotments, parks, open spaces and urban fringe.

He said he hoped residents would use the process to tell the Government planning inspectorate what they think.

Conservative Councillor Geoffrey Theobald said the report was almost identical to the report which had come to the committee three months earlier with just cosmetic changes.

He said: “By identifying these sites and putting them in the public domain, we have given the green light to developers for our most cherished sites next to the Downs.

“We should have consulted first and come along with a sites allocated rather than this haphazard of dealing with it.

Green Councillor Ollie Sykes said that the fact the environmental groups were now supporting the City Plan which they protested against in July did show significant progress had been made.

City Plan Update

From Friends of Hollingbury and Burstead Woods –

The Argus yesterday had two pieces about the city plan. In case you missed them they are worth a read. One is about allotments under threat from the same report which led to Hollingbury Park being on the list of potential sites for housing. The other points out that without an approved City Plan we are likely to have more trouble with a developer “free-for-all”. Basically because the Government’s Planning Framework encourages building for growth. Tony Mernagh of the City’s Economic Partnership says:
“Unfortunately what many don’t realise is that, unless the City Plan is passed and adopted, there won’t be anything to limit the number of homes built on these and other urban fringe sites. Without a Plan allocating specific, manageable and carefully thought-out numbers, planning applications will be judged by the yardstick of the National Planning Policy Framework with its default position of granting consent.
Developers won’t be proposing dozens of homes on sites like Ovingdean, it’ll be hundreds. ”

http://www.theargus.co.uk/…/11514546.Rejecting_the_city_pl…/

http://www.theargus.co.uk/…/11514490.100_homes_planned_for…/

http://www.fhbw.org.uk/